Man was a liar fraudulent use of {personality} do

Qiaomou: status review bank failed to encounter obligations
this case, maybe someone ambition Qiaomou done one injustice, but in fact, do not try to Qiaomou of identity and obligation to keep appropriate books, of lesson, to take responsibility for the deception.
Qiaomou 50-year-old, was originally a made shutters Baoying The self-employed, talk approximately the fraud, he has a lingering fear. In the complaint filed to the court, the Qiaomou about what had occurred.
Bank: cheated mainly Qiaomou negligence





early November last annual, Liu Jiandong, and others arrested. March 12, Baoying criminal courts to make decrees for fraud sentenced Liu Jiandong 10 years in jail and a half out of the income of Liu Jiandong not be regained should be returned Qiaomou $ 50,老师课堂猥亵6名小学女生续：学校不报警遭质疑,000. However, Qiaomou not been regained is exhausted, so he told the court, requiring banks to repay 50,000 yuan loss.
obligation to keep personal ID

next day, Liu Jiandong, who's identity card with Qiaomou mobilized a ######## ID Qiaomou holds this ######## ID, they are in the name of the bank to open Qiaomou an account.


Liu Jiandong, who pretentiously told Qiaomou, to sign a contract swiftly, and fast deposit accounts of $ 50,000,mbt fora shoes, or hospital presidency will mistrust your aptitude Loaning. Liu Jiandong left, Qiao Mouli that of $ 50,000 into account. In fact, this 50,000 yuan deposited in the name of Liu Jiandong, who set up accounts with Qiaomou.
court battle -


face judgments, some people had doubts: Not long ago, the public security sector is not reiterated: If fraudulent use of identity cards is lost by others, to another person and review the department should bear the corresponding legal responsibility, loss of documents were not assume any responsibility? How this statement with the court's sentence is not the same ah?

correspondent studied that the province of the judicial train of tribunals, verdict aboard similar cases are also generally the circumstance, accentuated that the public identification of safe custody obligations. distress. (Man, parties are not his real name)

to do with the identity card was fraudulent writing

correspondent in Yingjie Wang Qiang told reporters

lasts over half an hour, again with Liu Jiandong, who Qiaomou adjoin, the other call off, Qiaomou he felt bad, immediately to the bank to check the results on account of the money has been in different places auto teller machine in batches to take the light.
is true. Reporters knowledgeable that in real life, once the public identification improper care, who take it do bad entities really are, case in point, do a book with a duplicate of ID card alternatively bank card, to perpetrate deceit alternatively additional criminal doings, the folk themselves or to take hazards.




case, the judge told reporters, State Department,ugg sundance, the chief bank are apparently defined, fiscal traditions, an individual deposit accounts off, I should be queried to produce identification documents, account petition message to the depositor the authenticity, integrity compliance review. Case, the bank holds in Liu Jiandong, individual accounts, but the banks could obtain not certify that Liu Jiandong and Qiaomou the photo ID card are quite similar. Therefore, the bank does not Kejin review obligations, the loss is caused by Qiaomou a element, as appropriate, should bear the loss of 40% Qiaomou.
accordance with the regulations, Liu Jiandong to the bank to regulatory review, but the bank fair by Liu Jiandong take the
as a defendant,asics shoes online, the banks feel extra wronged. During the trial, they argued,nike air max 2011, in the process of Qiaomou passbook account, the staff shall review the Bank does not have anyone subjective mistake.
case, the judge advised that ID cards as the most important personal identity documents, required at statute, individuals have to keep, this is a valid obligation; ID cards to acquaintances borrowing is unlawful. If the loss for of their efficacy, or lightly by creature evil purposes of the
last July 17, a self-styled hospital. To the outpatient building, Liu Jiandong cried

Qiaomou reason is that the whole episode,kobe zoom iii, guiding to his cheated of $ 50,000, because the bank had violated the State Department pertinent provisions of the result.
judge reminded -

court -

Lou Hidaka mention, the hospital maneuvers customized 200 curtain deserving to sign a compact needs to Qiaomou provide commerce authorize and ID cards; said to be on Qiaomou verification, so that him to open a bank account and deposited $ 50,000. Qiaomou to make this
liar and copy the account to take advantage of the book Qiaomou remember the moment the fashionable account, put the book showed Liu Jiandong, who write down the account. Let Qiaomou did not anticipate that, on the surface, Liu Jiandong, who returned afterward copy complete account books,ferragamo wedges shoes, but in fact, account of the go to take avail of copy, Liu Jiandong,爷爷用棍棒教育调皮孙子将其打成重伤 自责坠亡, who have books Although, as is Liu Jiandong,五名疑犯用电话诈骗130万被抓, who opened the book.

Bank further pointed out namely the cases, resulting in Qiaomou 50,000 yuan fooled the chief cause for their own delinquency. Even whether banks have Qiaomou complained of so-called


the incident -
Not long antecedent, the Ministry reiterated in replying users' answers, if the fraudulent use of identity card is lost by others, to another human and review the division should bear the corresponding legal responsibility, loss of documents were not imagine any responsibility. In truth, while the community identity improper care, really do was take a book, bank cards, deposits impersonator or fraud, the individual or to take risks. Recently, the court concluded the Baoying deceived the public with a typical infringement case sued the bank. Qiaomou accuser made a Despite repeated protestations, but the court ruling Liu Cheng Qiaomou suppose responsibility for their own loss; bank has failed to meet the rigorous review of the ID card obligations, 4 percentage responsibility.

judge said, passbook deposits, for in charge of their important documents, and identity, for Qiaomou should be properly kept. The book was transferred Qiaomou pack, and did no take nice care of identification, is cheated of the two important causes of deposits, are indispensable. As Qiaomou of identity papers and books to improper care of cheated depositors to bear duty for Liu Cheng.

Qiaomou, banks responsible there is no contractual relationship among banks, the bank completely Qiaomou review obligations to others for private settlement account, and caused him loss of fault grounds for requesting an mandate bank liability, tort discussions.