monsoon wedding dresses Prosecutors arrested twice

the testimony of witnesses in the


2004 年 11 25, Wolong District, Nanyang City Procuratorate for examination and that the act does not constitute favoritism Ding Dongfang crime, the proposed withdrawal of a case of Nanyang City Procuratorate.
for the same thing
the family said, according to Ding Dongfang,monsoon wedding dresses, Ding Dongfang problems in place, although no arrests at the back when the Director, but quickly returned to the Prosecutor's position, was carried out competitive selection of Nanyang City Procuratorate When the post of deputy director of the hospital posts.
matter has in the past few years, this year the end of April, Ding Dongfang suddenly disappeared, and later learned he was under criminal detention Forest City Public Security Bureau, followed by prosecution of the arrest.
2002 年 5 31, Nanyang City Commission for Discipline Inspection to lift its

and at noon yesterday, after the end of the trial, Ding Dongfang own to Anyang - Cao Cao's tomb discovered in the grounds, the final statement in court, borrowing the famous seven-step Cao poetry Zhudou burning Douqi, beans in the kettle cry. This is the same root, fratricidal
the trial, due to the Director of the arrest was known as the , food for thought.
defendants and defense counsel conducted a cross-examination, in addition to food, accounted for 2 hours adjournment, the only evidence the prosecution presented 19 groups on the night 10:20 into the court during the 13 hours after the recess.

9:20, after the clerk announced disciplinary hearing, the judge into court. Subsequently, the presiding judge announced that the hearing with the defendant into court.

although the other key witnesses did not appear in court, but also had retracted their testimony. This is the case, said people give money - white post.
2003 年 9 on 10, Provincial Politics and Law Committee, the Procuratorate, Public Security Joint Investigation Conclusion: Ding Dongfang favoritism can not be found. April 26, 2004, Ding Dongfang was released on bail.

dramatic case, the defendant's Procuratorate at the former Director of arrest, and prosecution prosecutor is also the prosecutor. Near the beginning of the trial, the defendant Ding Dongfang Nanyang City Procuratorate to reference the words of a leader, his arrest was
proof period,mbt walking shoes, a cause worth mentioning that a lot of details to attend people's attention, that is, there is the testimony of witnesses called Ding Dongfang as Dong Fang brother.
witnesses frequent defection

2006 年 7 27, Nanyang City Procuratorate made the case taken off the case processing. Ding Dongfang detained a total of 132 days.


a focus of debate is how the case again after the withdrawal of the suit filing, and second, whether the accused favoritism, that is, the existence of facts of the crime of bribery 25,000 yuan and the third is whether the capricious and arbitrary, that is the pair of white jade Kong, who approved the arrest and not to approve the arrest, prosecution and defense evidence on the two sides in a heated debate.
re-filing was due to new evidence
seven-step trial in Yin Zhi poem


to the Director of the original arrest was arrested again
prosecutors charged Ding Dongfang June 2000 when the Director of any arrests, in the process of review of arrest 14 people suspected of white posts, which forced transactions, intentional destruction of property, intentional damage, disturb, and obstructing official business and other crimes , because before, during, and afterwards received a total of white gang, Fujian Li (Bai Gang's wife) in cash 25,000 yuan, alcohol and tobacco, garage doors and other property, and the white post Department of recidivism during probation, the contractors Wu Static (handled separately) that the post should be white, who arrest the case of a white gang oral Ding Dongfang, 14 comments per capita does not constitute a crime as contractors advice, instructions to contractors Wu Jing concealing evidence, distorted way, as false reporting,vibram barefoot shoes, result in the Commissioner Office will form a white gang, who approved the arrest of the wrong views do not, and eventually lead to arrest of 14 white people post wrong decision, indulgence of the crime, causing serious social impact.



2005 年 5 13, Wolong District, Nanyang City People's Procuratorate fact is unclear,long maxi dresses, evidence insufficient, the decision not to prosecute according to law.

2008 年 12 16, according to the requirements of Ding Dongfang, Henan Province People's Procuratorate, the State Compensation 13,108 yuan to its decision.

accused prosecutors
the defendant is called hearing before the strict security checks.

testify in the Wu Jing, the defense counsel produced to the court without proof of Ding Dongfang 6 groups of documentary evidence the crime of material, both parties acting outside the law around the Ding Dongfang constitute the crime carried out three arguments.
first focus on the prosecution that the case therefore the emergence of new evidence and re-initiate an investigation, the formation of a new chain of evidence. What is new evidence of Lin's Procuratorate of the relevant city leaders said, such as the core of the new witnesses have to say this, and different opinions on the past, a reasonable explanation, the testimony should be the real meaning of the expression. The on Wu Jing's estoppel, the prosecution believes that just the excuse it.
Wu Jing The 20th testimony, she said, though Ding Dongfang told her that the case should be on the white post distorted way to do a false report, on the contrary, she made are accurate and full reporting of cases.





Ding Dongfang's lawyer Kim Yong-Song Lu Partners law firm, state the forest Baoshan Sun Municipal Court court evidence, the evidence as







yesterday's hearing were to 12:20, the court did not make an immediate decision.
prosecution said
2003 年 7 15, Nanyang City Intermediate People's Court because of white gang crime has great merit exposing others to commit white gang trouble sentenced 2 years imprisonment for offenders sentenced to forced trading 6 months and fined 2,000 yuan, but the original crime of harboring sentenced to 3 years, decided to implement the 5-year imprisonment and fined 2,000 yuan.
Sun Baoshan, according to defense lawyers in court statistics, in the span of 10 years of cases, Wu Jing has made 19 times the testimony, of which 10 had not made a false report said, but a comprehensive and objective to a report on the case; 9 times called, is the Ding Dongfang ordered her to take to conceal evidence, distorted way, make false reports result in the Commissioner Office will form a white gang, who approved the arrest of the erroneous opinions do not, and ultimately lead to arrest white gang et al.

won first arrested in the State Compensation
white gang testimony in the trial confirmed that indeed sent 25,000 yuan to Ding Dongfang money and a garage door. Before that, he gave Ding Dongfang give money,asics gel 1150, gifts matter, and sometimes that sometimes and say no. Baoshan Sun said, according to his statistics, the white witness post has 8 times, 3 times that do not give money to the Ding Dongfang, 5 times that to send the money to Ding Dongfang.
9 am yesterday, Wu Jing the case of the most important witnesses to testify. She is the Ding Dongfang's subordinates, but also white gang arrests of 14 cases per capita is not the contractor who is also suspected of favoritism Ding Dongfang case of the most important witnesses.





2001 年 12 17, Nanyang Wancheng District People's Procuratorate at the same facts and evidence of crimes such as jade Kong approved the arrest of 8 persons. January 20, 2003, Bai Gang of 6 people were sentenced Nanyang City Wancheng District People's Court, which made trouble in the white gang was sentenced to 4 years, but the original crime of harboring sentenced to 3 years, decided to implement the prison 6 years.

years old cases

prosecutor that the accused Ding Dongfang served as the Director of arrests during the arrest in the white gang, who review suspected criminal cases before and after the white has received Kong, Fujian Li property, as Xunsi Qing, interests, making false reports indicate Wu Jing, Bai Gang, who caused the error is not approved by the arrest, the circumstances are serious, his acts violated criminal prosecution.
Subsequently, the prosecution on behalf of Forest City Procuratorate prosecutors began investigating the case to produce evidence. The evidence very long span,Vice Minister of Land Planning the bottom of this exploitation of the South China Sea Block 38 oil and gas fields, from 2000 until last May. Evidence mainly based materials written testimony, there are core witness credibility Ding Dongfang Wu Jingcheng directed, on cases of false reporting, eventually leading to the meeting to make a decision without the testimony of arrest, Bai Gang, Fu Jianli couple proved twice in the car , the first testimony in the office give money, arrest at the meeting, Deputy Director and two other testimony, the testimony of Attorney General in charge of materials, as well as evidence the prosecution of these materials when the video information.

9 15, in court, Lin City People's Procuratorate in the indictment that the defendant Ding Dongfang (formerly D East), male,Welcome the morning round of 28 at the Three Gorges Three Gorges ship lock again suspended flood peak, 49, Han nationality, graduated from the original Ren Nanyang arrest the Director of Municipal People's Procuratorate, the current Office of Nanyang City People's Procuratorate, deputy director of the crime alleged favoritism , at 14 November 2003 decision by the Nanyang Municipal People's Procuratorate arrested on December 18 the same year by Nanyang Municipal Public Security Bureau of the arrest, April 26, 2004 decision by the Nanyang Municipal People's Procuratorate be released, May 10, 2010 Forest City Public Security Bureau has been under criminal detention, the same 21 decision by the People's Procuratorate of Anyang City, arrested the next day by Forest City Public Security Bureau in the arrest.


of greeting to say Dingdong Fang denied.


this, the judiciary have claimed, like Ding Dongfang so that access to state compensation in the case with qualitative, once again on the same facts, the prosecution tried the same offense, not the judiciary in our country heard more Justice of the Republic called it the first case.
2003 年 8 14, Nanyang City Procuratorate Procurator malfeasance crime punishable by Ding Dongfang drew arrested suspected of acting outside the law, 11 14, D been arrested,Ningde cracked the case of illegal pyramid scheme to rescue 16 people 24 people arrested, the case for not being online wanted. December 16 that year, Ding Donghua Gate police station were detained by Beijing Public Security Bureau, December 18, Ding Dongfang by the arrest.
judicial sources said, the case is very rare. September 15, 16, the case in state court trial in the forest. It is worth mentioning that, although the prosecution said the renewal of proceedings due to new evidence found, but defense lawyers said the case two years repeatedly changed the testimony of key witnesses, one of them a total of 20 witnesses, including 11 with another 9 opposite the contents.


20 times to testify repeatedly to change the content
7 years ago, Nanyang prosecutors on suspicion of favoritism Ding Dongfang crime by the local Procuratorate arrest, detention 132 days after the release. Ding was later restored public, and received 1.3 million yuan for state compensation money. Many people think that this case settled, guessed a few years later in May of this year, Ding Dongfang case again because of the year, the same charges on suspicion of being arrested by the police state forest.
The article said, the review identified: December 10, 2001, according to some branch of Nanyang City Public Security Bureau police officers reported Wancheng, Nanyang City Commission for Discipline Inspection will be Ding Dongfang


the defense argued that the case and no new evidence, the indictment is which one is the real meaning of the expression can not judge this, the court can not be used as admissible evidence.