A tit Tencent Sogou 330,000 yuan and Pi Panpei

: a tit: Tencent and Pi Panpei Sogou 330,000 yuan soft media editorial: Chinese IT movie business has in no way been no lack of saliva within the early morning I beat you (It seems that neighborhood administrative officials are enjoying a major plate of every. Staged similar things each day, the real protagonist to it two or three. This can be just the situation final yr, Pinyin Preliminary Gauge the dispute, the next is in all probability the case of the browser. Lose to lose it, anyway, do ########, do fraud, piracy is performing very good fraction with the cost is revenue, there is superficial. If you will find days such as the violation is going to be fined a foreign bankrupt, then China, and will have a real hope of doing innovation. Make billions a 12 months, many hundreds of hundreds to create trouble from a lawsuit, imitation and plagiarism, genuinely superior deal. six 22 message, the Beijing Second Intermediate People's Court recently on Sogou v. Tencent to pronounce the situation of unfair competitors, judgments towards Tencent Shenzhen Tencent Computer Method Co., Ltd. and Beijing Olympic Grand facts Technology Co., Ltd. shall cease to give suspects QQ Pinyin input method software program obtain company and acts of unfair competitors, untrue marketing. At the identical time, the court Tencent complete compensation 331,500 yuan, and in www.qq.com so prominently a statement printed seventy-two hrs straight to eliminate the effect. 2009, Beijing Sogou Details Company Co. Ltd. and Beijing Sogou Technology Advancement Co., Ltd. accused the Tencent QQ Pinyin input method provided from the unfair competitors will Tencent Technologies (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Tencent Pc Technique Co. companies and to supply for Tencent QQ Pinyin input approach to download the services Information and facts Technologies Co., Ltd. Beijing Olympic Grand court, claims twenty million yuan. November sixteen the very same year, the Beijing Second Intermediate Court for the very first time hearing the situation. Beijing Second Intermediate Court underneath the : 1, Shenzhen Tencent Personal computer Technique Co., Ltd. around the efficient date with the decision to stop providing suspects > 2nd, the Beijing Olympic Rand Information and facts Technology Co., Ltd. within the powerful date of the choice to quit offering suspects br> c, Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. within the helpful date of the choice to quit enticing a consumer to delete concerned Fourth, Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. on this decision within ten days in the date of entry into force, compensation Beijing Sogou Details Company Co. Ltd. and Beijing Sogou Technology Development Co., Ltd. million financial reduction and litigation reasonably incurred thirty-one thousand yuan;
five, Tencent Technologies (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. in the effective date of this choice inside 10 days, for its false propaganda from the violations involved in the site (was: www.qq.com, www.tencent.com, www.tencent.web) prominently published a statement seventy-two hours straight to remove the impact of (contents with the statement to be audited from the Court, fails to perform, the Court is going to be issued inside the nation a national newspaper published the principal content of this decision at the expense of Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. burden); 6, court costs 144,355 yuan, the Beijing Sogou Specifics Service Co. Ltd. and Beijing Sogou Technology Advancement Co., Ltd. share the burden of 43,355 (already compensated), by Shenzhen Tencent Personal computer Technique Co., Ltd. burden of 500 (entry into force of this choice inside seven days in the date of payment), the Information and facts Technologies Co., Ltd. Beijing Olympic Grand burden of 500 (entry into force of this decision inside seven days from your date of payment) by Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. burden of 100,000 yuan (in the successful date of this decision inside 7 days to pay.) , love the net, fell in really like with Vista123.com