In its statement, the Chinese Embassy said Mr Shaikh was convicted of "serious" drug trafficking.
"The amount of heroin he brought into China was 4,
nike dunk high 6.0 shop,030g,
bose on-ear headphones, enough to cause 26,800 deaths, threatening numerous families," it said.
It added: "The legal structures of China and UK may be different,
monster beats for sale, but it should not stand in the way of enhancing our bilateral relations on the basis of mutual respect."
A spokeswoman for the Chinese Foreign Ministry, Jiang Yu,
abercrombie sale, told a press briefing in Beijing no-one had the right to comment on China's judicial sovereignty.
"We express our strong dissatisfaction and opposition to the British government's unreasonable criticism of the case. We urge [them] to correct their mistake in order to avoid harming China-UK relations,France to rethink carbon tax plan -UGG Women's Classic Argyle Knit," she said.
BBC world affairs correspondent Mike Wooldridge said in the final appeal for clemency before the execution Britain had expressed the hope that its relationship with China would count for something.
"But in the event,
mbt lami,
Yves Saint Laurent shoes,Buy Discount Ugg Boots ,Cheap Uggs Boots ,Ugg Cardy Boots-ugg classic short, its influence has been severely tested in this case," he said.
Charity MDF, The Bipolar Organisation, described the execution as "medieval rough justice" and an "absolute tragedy".
Spokesman Robert Westhead said: "The way the Chinese authorities have stubbornly failed to take account of this poor man's severe mental illness shows that China is still stuck in the dark ages."
topics related articles:
beats headphone - different sizes of ear adapters
hogan shoes london - 20-20kHZRated input
mbt m.walk shoes - ranging from shorts
If Justice Is Not Always an OutcomeMany of us would have hoped that the British government would not have jump on the American political bandwagon against Julian Assange but would have been more just and fair. But the might of America and its alliance seems to be more convincing to the UK government than justice and fairness. Winston Churchill once said that, "The whole history of the world is summed up in the fact that, when nations are strong, they are not always just, and when they wish to be just, they are no longer strong." How true it is? Is mighty America still just and fair? Does its flexing of its political muscles on a single individual (Julian Assange) who represents freedom of expression talk anything about justice and fairness?But justice is not always an outcome, as seen by the reactions of the British government towards Julian Assange who surrender voluntarily. So it needs the British justice system to provide a balance to the imbalance of political group thinking. UK as an ally wants to please its American political partner. But is it at the cost of justice and fairness? Do political alliances override justice and fairness? So, though many of us in the world would have hoped the British government to be more just and fair to Julian Assange, it did not turn out to be so. The dispensing of justice and fairness is now left to the British justice system which so far seems to be independent of political influence.