CSO - I just browse Bill Brenner's interview with Heartland Payment Systems' CEO Bob Carr [ Heartland CEO on Info breach: QSAs Allow us to Down] and truthfully, my blood is boiling. Mainly, he is throwing his QSA beneath the bus for your huge info breach that happened below his observe. Basically, since the QSA failed to acquire something, that is why he will want to be off the hook. I say that is a load of crap. It's about time organizations struggling from a info breach owned approximately the fact that they designed a error. You see, the good people at Johnson and Johnson didn't throw the pharmacy underneath the bus when Tylenol got poisoned in 1982, did they? NO! They accepted responsibility (even though it was not their fault) and re-established believe in with their consumers. This kind of response from Mr. Carr fundamentally proves that organization has learned Absolutely nothing from your data breach,
Office Pro 2010 64bit, which implies inevitably it can take place once more. To get apparent,
Windows 7 Home Basic Serial Key, you can't outsource considering. You can't outsource safety. An auditor or assessor is only there to substantiate the technical controls implemented to fulfill a regulation. They are not there to inform an organization whether they are safe or not. They aren't there to supply an itemized listing of every last practical attack vector that could compromise information. That,
Office Home And Business 2010 X86, my close friends, will be the duty of the internal safety group. That is what they do, and that is what they get paid for. And in Heartland's circumstance, that is what they clearly failed to execute. His security group really should have well-known in regards to the malware used on "300 other agencies." Why is it the auditors obligation to inform him of that? The auditors are there to determine regardless of whether they have met the spirit with the regulation. He makes the statement that "PCI compliance doesn't imply safe." Uh, is always that news to him? If so,
Microsoft Office 2007 Pro Plus Activation Key, then he's significantly more out of touch than I had feared. Anybody in this particular business appreciates that any regulation is about the starting of a thorough safety system, and PCI is no exception. And in addition, even though you're compliant, you aren't done. On the subject of security, that you're do not ever completed. Not so long as there's unfavorable guys (and gals) making an attempt to compromise your techniques. However you have to hand it to Mr. Carr. He is proving to get a master at misdirection. First of all it was the rather ridiculous push for end to finish encryption. As if that would have solved the issue at a realistic value. Now he is hoping to point the finger on the auditors. I'm positive when this goes above like a lead balloon, he'll be browsing for another scapegoat. Subsequent time, he'll be a lot more than pleased to throw Vontu and Voltage beneath the bus,
Office 2010 Pro Plus X86, seeing as he mentions them especially because the "answer" to make sure this isn't going to happen yet again.Sorry, I never pay for it. Widgets will not equal protection. Blaming some others does not make you secure either. I propose you look and feel inside the mirror Mr. Carr. That is where you are going to see the place the blame in the end lies. Any attempts to blame other people are hollow and disingenuous.