Refund not a public lawsuit against the Ministry o

[vily03935892]

Qiao Zhanxiang sued the Ministry of Railway Ticket Price
refund the embarrassing experience



method due to price comparison system requires that the principles of the hearing, also need a practical application of specific rules, but at the time lacked the necessary procedures to implement the circumstances, the Ministry of Railways and other organizations relating to price and consumer units are closely related to the nature of the hearing had similar consultation will be to demonstrate the feasibility of floating prices, and on this basis to the relevant authorities for approval to perform, which is consistent with the requirements of administrative procedures.


2001 年 11 5 March, the Beijing First Intermediate People's Court Qiao Zhanxiang lost. Qiao Zhanxiang satisfied, then an appeal.

recently, Chu Jinghui for
I refund. I said, how can you not give me a refund? that the staff and I are anxious to say, I am still working, but this is a new requirement, I also act in accordance with regulations! This is something I can stop you on the We go find the manager on duty floor. to the Beijing Railway Station is 10 pm, and the Beijing Railway Station, I saw a big announcement, which said in 2010 , the refund no later than 6 hours before driving.

no reason!



notify the Ministry of Railways, Beijing residents affected by this notice, a refund fails, then has the Ministry of Railways to court and request to confirm the adjustment of the Ministry of Railways informed the procedure illegal


30-year-old Chu Jinghui looks very sturdy, head bristling board inch, Yuehua Jian used to playing with a left wrist with his right hand a string of beads .
learned that the court case in May this year.
second instance, the two sides focused on a point of contention made by the Ministry of Railways, and whether the Ministry of Railways during the period of administrative reconsideration and other issues to fulfill their statutory duties transferred.

■ link


a court after the trial ended, a person pointed out that the present case, Qiao Zhanxiang v. Ministry of Railways train fares go up some of the visitors failed to fulfill the hearing procedure, which is a fact. However, if divorced from the prevailing order without hearing procedures, to categorically identify the Ministry of Railways to make the fare go up is not an acceptable notice is not legitimate.

Ministry of Railways, according to law.
before Chu Jinghui purchased from Beijing to Hefei, the Z73 times a soft ticket, at 21:57 on February 26 distribution of vehicles, the fare is 400 yuan. White Cloud Temple in Beijing taxi to Beijing West Railway Station, to the West Railway Station, he was not on the big screen in the waiting room to see their trips, only to find to the wrong station,nike soccer shoes, Z73 times should Zhanshang Ju in Beijing.

Furthermore, the fares go up act has been implemented, involving a wide range, with the passage of time, the evidence difficult to collect, not only difficult to implement, but also directly affect the social stability and unity. In addition, the floating charges from the people, giving back to people, but also from the fundamental interests of the public demand. Therefore, the provisions in the package before the implementation of the Price Law, the Ministry of Railways prices go up no inappropriate behavior.
sued the Ministry of Railways, February 26 this year due to an


Chu Jinghui said: much trouble. According to Article XVIII of Price Law, ticket prices are important to utility prices and the major public service prices, a government price range. pricing decisions of the hearing the government project is the central and local pricing directory bearing on the vital interests of the prices of public utilities, public service prices and prices of natural monopolies. said: the beginning say it? 'I do not know this notification.






Beijing Higher People's Court upheld the verdict.
Qiao Zhanxiang then has sued the Ministry of Railways, Beijing First Intermediate People's Court, quashing the decision of reconsideration requests; revoke the defendant's fares go up notification.

Hebei lawyers Qiao Zhanxiang that the price of the notice without a hearing, violated their legal rights, filed for administrative reconsideration to the Ministry of Railways. Ministry of Railways to maintain in a subsequent review of the fares go up notification.
2000 年 12 21, the Ministry of Railways issued on the 2001