"Lance Winslow" - Online Think Tank forum board. If you have innovative thoughts and unique perspectives,
Colette Handbags, come think with Lance; www.WorldThinkTank.net/wttbbs/
cost prohibitive and creates barriers to entry, thus eliminating competition,
Sinful Swimwear, consumer choice and causing further problems down the road for the very consumer such disclosures are suppose to be helping. “Cost-Effective,
coach factory outlet,” reminds me of NASA spending a million dollars to engineer a pen that could work in the International Space Station, the Russians took a $ .04 pencil. How would government know anything about being cost-effective? That is utter nonsense and that phrase and premise; “cost-effective” has any basis. This cost-effective message, which is extended thru the report is a hole in the whole foundation of the argument for any for massive disclosure rules in the first place.
Any comments to the contrary simply are made out of ignorance, self-serving greed or a socialism skewed view of the world. We need to stop listening to lawyers and start listening to the freedoms which free markets create. This is not a Communist or Socialist country, this is a Republic and a Capitalistic country and it is the best country on this planet in this present period. Surely we can keep it so into the next period. It is unacceptable to make such comments in a report by the Federal Trade Commission and scary to think that a business model, which has given as much as franchising to this country would be further regulated; costing more American Jobs. Think about it. Cost-Effective? Not hardly. That is about the last thing I would describe it as. If these are the words used by attorneys in the franchising industry to describe our current disclosure requirements then such men could not possibly know their own bumper from a rabbits lair. I think you know what I am saying here. If not think about it and think about the other issues concerning over regulation in all sectors of our economy. Thanks for listening.