Expert commentary cited the case of drugs at home

Criminal Psychology expert Li Meijin (data sheet)

for
not Pingmin Fen

□ He Weifang: Do the masses the way anyone's carnival

□ Wang Zhongwu: the public will accept their similar views

tie him with a knife to the girl, I think his actions have wronged in his heart, he has pain when he has not resigned, he was pressed in front of the piano playing the same action a . - Xin Li Meijin Comment drug house

Majiajue of the killings has nothing to do with poverty, and discrimination has nothing to do, should be responsible for this bloodshed, not social but Majiajue himself. The existing law, nor any provision in the commission of such crime, poverty can be reduced simply because the punishment.
- Li Meijin Comment Majiajue

crimes do not necessarily need to make a huge injustice, does not necessarily require reasonable grounds, a lot of crime is very stupid.
- Li Meijin Comment Yang

old miner pneumoconiosis by 86 yuan pension governance

Zibo: an industrial city of the >
Wikipedia, the criminal psychology experts, the Chinese People's Public Security University professor of criminal psychology Li Meijin's profile, once modified into a From the March 23 disaster, Xi'an Conservatory of Music student murder trial Xin drug house that night, Li Meijin CCTV comment that the reason why medicine bundle in a snap with 6 knife action, and his long training on the piano. Soon, Lee's statement by netizens as I also caught Lee saliva into the sky.
Recently, Li Meijin exclusive interview.
reporter intern Jiang Xue Chen Chao

the hereinafter referred to as
Li Meijin (hereinafter But I will also reflect on why do we create the illusion.
Reporter: Do you think that cause?
Lee: I feel a lot of first-line an article reprinted, called Piano forced to kill law. A raised this argument, many have not seen the video, do not even know before and after the process of users to the general that he was right, so I began to curse.
If you go directly to the video, there will be all kinds of stories, but now we are unified with the
in mind: if not passed a drug house Xin military background, will not have the current situation?
Lee: Ma Jiajue case, Qiu Xinghua case and the Yang Jia case, the public tend to crime, because the first few people are all weak in the eyes of the public, except family medicine Xin not. But the fact is the pharmacy of the materials, he did not complex background, China has tens of thousands of such families.
about the bottom line

Discourse Context and the appropriateness of the rule of law In the blog, you endorse this view.
Lee: Context is very important, I did not analyze the same day, illusion - experts with the public view of the differences in perspective lead to this illusion.
in mind: Do you think most users want to express what your point of view in the show?
Lee: I see now that they let me talk about that drug house Xin heinous crime, do not kill enough Pingmin Fen. They want this sentence, but as an expert I absolutely can not say this.
in mind: how to explain?
Lee: I have reason. He is not got to be is the decision of the Court. I did not review the case, can not make that evaluation. If you do that kind of evaluation can be found Penalists. I am a criminal psychologist. I can not say that he got to be in that place or not got to be. Called the public trial, I, as an expert, I can not do public trial.
another part of the CCTV, we have an expert commented that How can you say something like that in that place, you or a law professor. Our own in this crusade, Professor, how can I say something like that on that occasion, I even medicine is not in the CCTV from the capital did not answer. Because I did not review and can not be judged.
about mind


Lee: motive for the crime but also to me? He said, I got there (CCTV) told the audience that this was a deliberate murder, and that my comments are too funny.
concern I think CCTV is a well-educated, why not premeditated in the case of the victim so much instant tool bar to make such a terrible thing. Behavior we see from the case of his background, what is more important is the prevention. I think it needs is the answer, then I must explain is the problem.
Reporter: But the public does not seem to understand the action of this moment comment and to seek answers to any contact.
Lee: people usually have a background in the angry behavior of multiple actions, even when people call me angry, not a word often can Jiehen's. So, drugs in the night of the murder, the first lift up sword in his life time of the killing, he is more than fear or anger it more? I was: he should fear more, he should tie a incisions wanted to run, and may even arise because of accidents and fear can not be controlled shaking.
but even in an instant tool bar so much, why did he not worried, why did he stop? This is the crux of the problem. Therefore, I analyzed his psychological background of the action bar one: the long-term mechanical movement, long-term human isolation, the formation of long-term forced to psychological problems such as the piano - has an artistic and a lack of humanity. So I think that playing the piano with him about, and what's wrong?
in mind: your goal is, by analyzing the causes of abnormal behavior, to avoid more
Lee: I would like to reflect on the origin of his problem where - is the only skill, not emotion. I asked what his favorite musician, he replied that Chopin is romantic. But we all know that if you want to practice Grading Test is a technical piece. To be honest, shuffling back and forth ten fingers, ten test to how much music he had to practice? Therefore, he experienced what, I do not know how many people understand the process. And we now how many parents want their children to be Lang Lang, and we are repeating the this road, this is my reflection. All the skills, the arts, knowledge must be made when a human child, have value. You say these words I can understand how no one? Including the university professors, what Peking University, Tsinghua University.
about expert

Mr. Xiao Ying, also have different views on your point of view.
Lee: I say I said, Many (blame me) experts, if not do this profession, this understanding, the logical error is not there. Now these are not my words become my words. Then he came to political campaigns, you, and should not be your defense.
note: In addition to published blog response Xiao Ying, and what else he communicate?
Lee: I am very kind to find Professor Xiao Ying's blog, left him saying: Professor Xiao biggest difference between we two, is your area of ​​expertise of others which are too conceited.
I think that these words were a little academic literacy should be understood to cut it out. If say you have to say point. Do you want to ask around in the professionals of psychology, I would have no reason at all. But I think he does not understand, this is no reason why I was him.
talk about feelings


Lee: I do not want, some things are not eager to have used, but not the first time I experienced such a thing. Qiu Xinghua from Majiajue case to case, I have not scolded less, including the Patrick case. I am very calm face of all this, I am not eager to explain.
I think this is where social differences. You as an expert to study the problem from one angle, not everyone can understand you.
I do not quarrel with them. But I think the most incredible is that some of our professors, I am so calm reason for him he did not understand, he even attacked my personality, personality,nike shoes uk, you and I have met you, do you know my profession, what is Experts compulsive personality? I think this is our sad, how the this famous university professor, but also the nerve to accuse me again and again.
note: you are very disappointed?
Lee: We are university teachers and users of the impetuous temper, is the transformation of Chinese society today we have a whole period of the embodiment of the thermometer. I'm not angry, I think this is the reality, and slowly the face. But I hope, look back on the case after a number of years, people will think, the teacher makes it clear to the analysis of art education, what issues are particularly dangerous.
do professional analysis, how to avoid the next Li Meijin: Reviews, Chinese People's Public Security University, Professor Li Meijin highly controversial criminal psychology, she has exerted so was no longer the case for public comments on the idea. But this is only glimmer. killed by bricks, and then tie Daozha die.

Li: particularly concerned about public opinion on the drug case I guess the judges are not easily closed.
program I did yesterday, there was a guest on the lawyer said a lot, I did not have the nerve to stop him. I think the lawyer is doing this trip, he is wrong it should be, do not attack him. I do not agree with crimes of passion, because the case did not constitute crimes of passion: both words and actions do not conflict, so there is no passion. But I never went against the law because of this, I think his defense, his defense of things should be called. He ate this bowl of rice, dry it live, you should speak for the drug house Xin. Legal punishment is a specific behavior, you have to kill to pay for the killing, but this person does not mean you can be insulted, to be abusive, I think this is two different things.
Reporter: Will you still be the case for public comment it?
Lee: It was after the fall of BSE infected in unexplained circumstances, will soon have a second, third down. If there are no people to observe and analyze the drug house Xin mental illness because, even if the drugs kill family Xin, still can not solve the same problem: we walk in the street, Paul was missing and then hit, and then be rolled, and then was crushed brick, and then tie Daozha death.
Comments drugs in this case I caused so much controversy after, especially the vicious verbal abuse, I really have had this idea: after the comment in any case no longer closed to the public. However, my research and my ethics tell me that when I found out the reasons and issues behind the case, do not tell the community, do not warn you, that is dereliction of duty. Because this situation will soon be reproduced!
I think that my research can benefit many people, including attacks on abuse of my friends and their loved ones. My research should be respected, not for me, but for our society.

Lee: I do not see the text, but in our university's Department, almost all see my face peer said: We have all seen things online, you do not mind him, they do not know . I say
Lee: I received so much these days has always been very little contact friends, sent a text message said: We looked at all your videos, we agree with your point of view, you are correct, do not be afraid . I saw these really touched a lot of them feel that life does not need you to please, to acknowledge your people. I still have a bosom friend.
In fact, many journalists, including Zhang Quan Ling, I have not met, only telephone connection - the case of Huang Yong, even over the line I told her. We really belong to the journalists at the turn of the sound, not seen, but in this comment which they are encouraged me, saying you have to be strong Teacher Li, I said you at ease.
China today is the most conscientious reporter group. Gratitude is a very light sentence, these things I have in mind. I think we have a common feeling that we have the responsibility to society.
why ridicule expert users? Wang Zhongwu: the public has only elected position with similar views

Xin Pharmaceutical Case of great concern in the home, including the Beijing University Law School professor He Weifang,nike air max, professor of Nankai University, the famous young scholars Xiongpei Yun, Shandong University Sociology Professor Wang Zhongwu in , through micro-Bo, interviews and other means to express their views. Text / reporter intern Jiang Xue Chen Chao He Weifang: >
He Weifang, also showed that the criticism column for Professor Kong Qingdong, video, look at all the comments my colleague. Although all full of righteous indignation for the killer, but I have to say, his words not often full of self-contradiction, but itself is filled with violent of the gas. netizens thread were mostly cheering applause. We certainly can sentence a person to death according to law, but can not order people put to death our carnival similar way?
Xiong Peiyun: potential retaliation is more than bad

in the The case of family medicine Xin, Xiong Peiyun microblogging addressed again in the Death Penalty. Posted this in the 10 micro-Bo, Xiong Peiyun said: killed. This is in fact a potential retaliation than bad. pain in the. to the sense of justice, what has not lost. Why become a common practice experts ridicule.
This requires viewed in two ways. First, the public is not demanding experts,coach store, is the so-called experts with expertise in a particular area of ​​people.
the same time, Wang Zhongwu pointed out that experts in the community that are part of the herd is too kitsch, too strong a sense of social participation, has nothing to do with their own areas of expertise should also talk about participation,coach outlet store online, the results revealed the limitations of their knowledge ######, once the public received a similar injury specialists, expert eaten losses, there will be a great distrust of experts.
specific to the Public Security University, Professor Li Meijin was will naturally stand to the opposite side, it is very likely to cause the network to violence. In addition, the network determines the spread of Internet users do not need the property of their participation in the network responsible for the violence which caused, it also exacerbated the situation appears similar.
Han Honggang:

dislocation multi-context

between the public's understanding of the context of dislocation, resulting in the Li Meijin was
the article, Li Meijin on the interpretation of drug killings is not in an academic nonsense, but do not meet the academic standards of the system before the video provided by only one television station to make the analysis of improvisation Obviously, loss of rigor. In addition, Li Meijin no words taking into account its technical suitability and legal context. Li Meijin public explanation as to drug acquittal, as the excessive loss. This misunderstanding comes from a long-standing major mental set that the judicial power is about due to the loss of justice, experts often do injustice to justice, In addition, Lee used the
public explanation as to Li Meijin in the In fact, Li Meijin's explanation points to the killing of criminal suspects of Her analysis is valuable, as pointed out by Li Meijin, in the absence of family education nowadays But the public's put that (Editor: SN021)