ohl.com at lists.samba.org
[mailto:samba-bounces+jallgood=ohl.com at lists.samba.org] on behalf of fc
mario patty
sent: tuesday,
Office Professional Plus 2007 Key, december 09, 2008 9:09 pm
to: samba
subject matter: re: [samba] ldap + samba + windows2003 hi john,
Office 2010 Home And Student 64bit, i'm not an expert in this field (you’re able to see i've thrown quite a lot of
questions
into this mailing checklist), but i think for those who just like to use ldap as
linux/samba password backend, then you certainly never ought to build up a pdc. in my
situation
it truly is just occur that my domain pdc put in in to the similar server that
i
use as my openldap server possibly, but to allow my other samba server to
authenticate in opposition to the openldap server, it's the pam_ldap and
nsswitch.conf + ldap.conf that matter (in case you use redhat, the authconfig
command and 'smbpasswd -w ldap-admin-password-here will handle this for
you). an alternative prove is my samba server workgroups differs from that of
my
pdc. other point, if you'd like samba to authenticate against the ldap server,
you
do have sambasamaccount. posix only has an effect on linux or unix
authentication.
and together with your windows 2003, linux samba pdc does not must join your
windows server domain if you just want them authenticating against the
ldap
server. it really is your windows pcs/servers which have to join samba pdc previous to
you
can authenticate against it. but if what you meant was windows to
authenticate straight to ldap,
Microsoft Office 2007 Ultimate Key, i've practically never heard it ahead of (in my situation,
it really is
the pdc that confirms the authentication for the ldap as its password
backend
- windows devices don't do this them-selves). nicely,
Office 2010 Pro 32bit, that is my tiny imagined. but nevertheless i don't prefer to misslead you.
samba or linux gurus, make sure you appropriate this. :) cheers, on tue, dec nine, 2008 at nine:29 pm,
Microsoft Office Professional Plus 2007 Serial Key, allgood, john <jallgood at ohl.com> wrote: >