Everyone belongs to one of these levels. Peter Principle is the American scholar Peter Lawrence staff in the organization after the promotion of related phenomena, to one conclusion: in a variety of organizations, employees tend to always elevated to the position of their incompetence. Peter Principle is sometimes called the principle of the climb. This phenomenon is ubiquitous in real life: a competent, after a professor was promoted to university presidents, but not competent; an excellent athlete was promoted to director of sports officials, and mediocrity. An organization, once a considerable part of the staff pushed to the level of their incompetence, the organization will result in overstaffing, inefficiency, resulting in mediocre to succeed, and the development of stagnation. Therefore, it requires a simple change in contribution decisions under the promotion mechanism to enhance the employees, not in a position for a person doing a good job, this person will be able to infer higher-level job competence. An employee will be promoted to a position can not be a good play, not only is not on my award, but it can not be a good play, but also cause losses to the enterprise.
2, wine and water laws
refers to a spoonful of wine into a bucket of water and got a bucket of water; if a spoonful of sewage poured into a bucket of wine, or get a bucket of water. In any organization, there are several hard to get almost all of the characters, their purpose of existence is to get things like mess. Worst of all, they like the fruit rotten apples in the box, if not in time, it will quickly transmitted to other Apple fruit box smash. Rotten apple's scary, is that it is the amazing destructive power. An honest man into a good part of the confusion may be swallowed, but only a non-German who can quickly become an effective part of the mess. Organizational systems are often fragile, is built on mutual understanding, compromise and tolerance based on very easily be violated, was poisoned. Another important destroyer extraordinary ability to reason is easily destroyed than building. A skilled craftsman to spend time carefully crafted ceramics, a donkey out of a second can be destroyed. If an organization has such a donkey, even with more of the craftsmen, nor how many decent work. If your organization has such a donkey, you should immediately rid of it, if you are unable to do so, it should be tied up.
3, bucket Law
law is about a bucket a bucket can hold much water, which depends entirely on its shortest piece of wood. This means that any one organization, may face a common problem, that constitute the organization's strengths and weaknesses of each part is often missing, while the inferior part of the often determines the level of the entire organization. Law and wine and water buckets of different laws, which are discussed in the destruction of tissue strength, the shortest of the wood is a useful part of the organization, but worse than others, you can not throw them as a rotten apple out. Strength is only relative, not eliminate, the problem is that you tolerate this kind of weakness to what extent, if a serious bottleneck to become an obstacle to work, you have to have action. HR elite blog 'j ^' H m Q} S u! a
4, Matthew
come see me. King came back, the first servant said: Master, you entrusted me with a silver, I have earned a 10. So the king rewards his 10 cities. The second servant report: the owner, you gave me a silver, I have earned a 5. So the king rewards him five cities. The third servant, the report said: Master, you gave me a silver, I have been wrapped in handkerchief, fearing loss, has not been out. So the king ordered the servant of a third given to the first servant of silver, said: any less, even he has will be taken from him. Any more, even to him, called him the better, this is Matthew, the reaction in today's society there is a common phenomenon, that winner takes all. In terms of business development, Matthew tells us that, in order to maintain the upper hand in a certain field, we must rapidly expand in this area. When you become a leader in the field, the same even if the return on investment, you can more easily get more than their counterparts in small gains. And if one area does not expand rapidly in strength, we must keep looking for new areas of development, to ensure better returns.
5, zero-sum game theory
zero-sum game is a game, the player wins or loses there, it is the other party to win the lost, the game's total score is always zero, zero-sum game principle reason for broad interest mainly due to people in all aspects of society and the zero-sum game can be found a similar situation, the winners are often hidden behind the glory of the bitterness of failure and bitterness. 20th century, mankind experienced two world wars, economic growth, technological progress, globalization and the increasingly serious environmental pollution, zero-sum game concept is gradually being replaced by the concept of win-win situation. People began to familiar to the benefit has not necessarily built on the basis of the expense of others. Through effective cooperation happy ending is possible. But zero-sum game to win, asked to have all aspects of the spirit of sincere cooperation and courage, cooperation and not a small smart, do not always want to share other people's cheaper to comply with the rules of the game, or win-win situation would not arise, the ultimate suffer or collaborators themselves.
6, Washington, co-laws
cooperation law in Washington, said that a person half-heartedly, two people passing the buck, three people were never brought to fruition the day. Somewhat similar to the story of our three boys. Cooperation between people, not the simple addition of manpower, but to much more complex and subtle. In this cooperation, the capacity of each assumption is 1, then the results are sometimes 10 people co-operation is much greater than 10, sometimes even much smaller than 1. Because people are not static objects, but rather the energy of different directions, each drive, naturally, be more effective, in conflict with each other, then nothing. Our traditional governance theory, was not a few of the collaborative research, is reflected in the most intuitive, most of the current system of governance and human behavior are all committed to reducing the unnecessary consumption, rather than the use of organizational human performance improvement. In other words, it may be said that the main purpose of governance is not that everyone do a better job, but to avoid excessive friction.
7, watch Theorem
watch theorem is that a person has a table, you can know it is a few minutes, when he also has two tables, but can not be determined. Two watches and can not tell a man to the right time, but will watch the people lose confidence in the correct time. Watch Theorem governance in the business, gives us a very intuitive inspiration, is the same person or an organization with governance, can not use two different methods, can not set two different goals, and even each individual command can not be two people, otherwise this company or this person will know what to do. Theorem another layer of meaning within the meaning of the watch is that everyone can not choose between two different values, otherwise, your behavior will be disrupted.
8, not worth the Law
not worth the laws of the most intuitive interpretation is: the things not worth doing, is not worth doing well. This law could not be simpler, but often overlooked importance of the forgotten. Law does not reflect people worthy of a psychological, if a person is engaged in a self that is not worth doing, tend to remain cynical, perfunctory manner,
Louis Vuitton Shoes, not only the low success rate, and even if successful, do not feel much sense of accomplishment. Therefore, personally, should be available in a variety of goals and values of the selected one, and then strive for it. Choose what you love, love your choice, it may inspire us to fight, you can also peace of mind. And on a business or organization, will have a good personality characteristics of employees, fair distribution of work, such as a strong desire for achievement alone or lead employees to complete a certain risk and difficulty of the work, and in its completion, giving timely recognition and praise; so dependent workers want a stronger,
outlet, more participants to a group * with the work; make workers stronger desire for power as an ability to adapt with it head. At the same time to strengthen the staff of the business goals of the identity, so that employees feel the work is worth it, so as to stimulate the enthusiasm of employees.
9, mushrooms governance
mushrooms fledgling governance is treated by many organizations as a treatment method, beginners are placed in a dark corner (not valued part of the work or run errands and do odd jobs), doused with a dung (undue criticism , accused vicarious), left to its own devices (without the necessary guidance and guidance and help.) I believe many people have had such a mushroom experience, this is not necessarily a bad thing, especially when everything just started, when the days of mushroom, can eliminate many of our illusions, let us closer to reality, more practical problems. An organization, the general staff of the new entrants are treated equally to the work from the starting salary will not be a big difference. No matter how talented you are,
Louis Vuitton Handbags, at the beginning of time, can only start from the most simple things, mushroom experience, for growing young people, like cocoon, is experiencing a step before emergence. So, how efficient through this period of life, from experience gained as much as possible, mature and reliable set a good personal image, the young people of every newly recruited community must face.
10, law of Occam's razor
12 century, the United Kingdom William of Ockham advocated nominalism, only recognized the existence of things,
Louis Vuitton Agendas, that those who empty the universality of the concept is useless burden, should be ruthless to shave. He advocated if not necessary, not by entity. It is often said that Occam's razor. This razor has made many people feel threatened, that is heresy, so be *** William himself. However, no damage to the knife's sharp, on the contrary, after hundreds of years, history of Occam's razor has been worn more and more rapidly, and has already overloaded the original narrow field, and a broad, rich and profound meaning . Occam's razor law in corporate governance can be further evolution of the law of simple and complex: simple things become complicated, simple things become very complicated. This law requires that we deal with things, to grasp the main essence of things, grasp the mainstream to address the most fundamental problem, in particular, in harmony with nature, not man-made things complicated, so as to handle things.
future
CEO of our company is the HR financial experts, more importantly, you are a master EQ. If you possess these points, you will be a good professional managers.
As there is no future for HR to do, I seen such a professional online reported that
相关的主题文章：
Company)
Chinese Academy of Social Sciences and other units
cursor pointer;
Each organization is by a variety of different pos
Auspicious
Hybrid Mode
