Re- tell some of the concepts (from Zen wrapped in

Why, then, to distinguish the second case, because it does not want to appear on the segment level to turn up the level of such a small level of uncertainty, with the second case will be able to solve this problem.
on the understanding of this passage we are different, I am following example to distinguish the problem.
Furthermore, line segments are damaged, must not be damaged by the segment of the same nature, that is, from a starting line up up a line segment can not be broken, must be from down a destroyed by the beginning of line.
do add:
pen on the end of the first N-1 sub-type is the location of the underground conditions can be similar to the proof.
first example illustrates the use of gap classification based strictly on the basis of correct prediction of thinking. Any forecast must be based strictly on the basis of classification, which is a basic way of thinking, otherwise, all reveling in the pure probability of the game, can only be bored if interesting.

which, to judge by the first case law is even more clear, the above situation is impossible to form a characteristic sequence typing, of course, can not be completed segment.
Needless to say, by definition, as long as the inclusion relation clear, I believe men should be able to even bore some Miao Hong. If you did not include the relationship between the three K lines can determine a sub-type, but note that between any adjacent sub-type must meet with law, that is, not some K lines belong to different sub-types, this is not allowed The.


With the pen, is the line of the. Line by the most basic principle that the line must have at least three items, it is very clear, otherwise, could form a line, that sum and the difference between what line? As for the two pen why can not constitute a line segment, this reason is more simple, because the two pens, two line segments then the nature of the sub-type must be the same, and the pen as a complete line of the two sub-types can not be the same character The. That, and the pen, the line can not start from a top end in a hat, or from one end to a bottom end of the beginning. Thus, the number of segments included in the pen, are singular.

there is a complex situation, in today's 80-83 in the classification has emerged. Is on the 80-81, there has been damage to the pen first,prada boots, then followed by a standard consistent with the trend line A, but no new lows, this of course can not be considered a continuation of the original line, but the damage can not be considered line, and why? Does not meet the requirements for the three pens. Then, a rebound, but also to meet the requirements of line, and then turned to new lows. There is a subtle difference, if this is just a rebound, then there is no damage to the trend A, followed by the new base, it means that A is still the trend continues, so the trend of A is a continuation of the original 80-81.
(this figure from jttnb's BLOG)
read some, I would like to emphasize the purpose of my article is to discuss a problem: simply put, is a characteristic sequence of a type, a characteristic sequence of the first type is the second case When is it a characteristic sequence as a former One is the second case, but you can not because of a characteristic sequence before the establishment of a say establishment, but also to start discussion, then we should look at is the first or the second case, if it is the second case, it depends on whether the back of that type established, and it further into the back of that type the


If we insist on the ultimate destruction of line characteristic sequence covering the gap case, then, if the line segment B or C on the second case, then the line segment C of the range of positive features to the segment A and segment B sequence characteristic sequence gap gap between, and so on, is always a segment X, makes the front of the line is the corresponding characteristic sequence covering the gap, otherwise these segments will be infinitely narrow interval, the last will form a point, which is obviously impossible, learned the limits should be able to understand. So, in a string of first-line segment is the second relative to the situation before the line string, such as the ultimately lead to the destruction of the first case, push the back down so there is bound to assume that a string of straight line segments between the damage.



In addition, the line must be destroyed by line to determine its completion. For the line by the first case, if the document destruction occurred after the first, then the sum to a new high, and then after a, it simply does not touch a document destruction, then, this time, obviously can not constitute the destruction of the line segment, because these latter three items did not overlap that can not constitute a line segment.
Therefore, in determining the course of the pen, must meet the above conditions, this can be uniquely identified by the pen. The uniqueness of this division is very easy to prove, if two conditions are satisfied by the two division to be different, must be divided from the first two N-1 is the same document before, from the first N pen first began to appear different, the N-can be equal to 1, this is different from the start. Then the first N-1 document the location of the end of typing, apparently by the nature of the two is the same, all the top or bottom. Is the case for the top, then the first N T, by the end of the two end points must correspond to a different type, or is this the same division of the two, apparently contradictory. Since the division type is unique, therefore, divided in two different N pen at the end of the corresponding type, there must be in the order gap between before and after, but not between these two end also There is a roof, or where it is not fortune.


In general, people who are not familiar with, first of all should, by definition, the analysis of the diagram contains relationship type, and in accordance with the basic law to the mark after a good, top-type can use the down arrow , bottom type can be used up arrow, so clear out.



general, covering very little ground-breaking gap, while the trunk of the gap, which is the trend continued in the gap, covering the risk in half, but they must go on a high or low, that is, at least the potential is flat The. Once, after covering the gap is no longer high, low, it means a reversal of previous trends, this gap is the failure of the characteristics that once this happens, we will be at least a larger level of adjustment, this level of at least a large continuation in the trend of the time gap level. That is, a daily gap in debilitating level trends, at least to create a weekly level of adjustment. And a 5-minute level of failure of the shortfall, at least 30 minutes to create a level of adjustment.
Moreover, the line that started three items, there must be coincidence, started three items did not overlap, is not constitute a line segment.

K line, pen, re-line problem resolution of a Legend: Happy vs vegetable insects (2008-07-09 09:42:59)
I always have a wish, that is, K must be first line, the pen, the line to completely win, so as to concentrate on research trends; should say so long after all the learning, discussion, practice, K Line, pen, generally have mastered almost line, but there are a few small problems, such as needle felt I sit. So I put a few back issues enumerated by several articles discuss one by one and we hope to solve these problems on this, so that we can fully grasp the K line, pen, line, fully involved in the trend of learning.
Also, I did not press these articles K line, pen, write the order line, but casual good time.
In the entangled sister September 25, 2007 article C is the corresponding line segment B of the damage, no points the first, two kinds of situation. This is actually a simplified method. Why?
learning Bo Kee:
Replies

Re-tell some of the concepts (2007-09-05 23:24:01)
Politics Economy from the original (wrapped in the Zen of Economics)
I'm sorry, home late, and now only then written Tieshanglai course.
above, then this figure can be viewed as only those for type, classification can be between the K line temporarily not control. The following work is to determine the pen. Pen, one must be an end, and between the top and bottom line of at least one K type does not belong to the top and bottom classification. Of course, there is one of the most obvious is in the same amount, the top of the highest type K line range that at least part of the classification than the lowest end of the line that K range, if this is not met, but also is in the top of the range or top end is lower than the bottom, which is clearly unacceptable.


segment of the second case, in fact, contain the situation. That is, according to the first case, the line A line B has not been followed by the destruction, but then the damage to the line segment C B, therefore, the line B is completed, of course, line A should also be completed. Note that the segments A, B, C just before use by combining the principles of law, inside parentheses meet the basic properties of line segments, not in this relationship is confirmed before the destruction, this is called a hypothesis.

only from the above document by proof, in fact, know how to divide the pen steps:




Because of this, so in the second case, the judge in the second signature sequence, are no longer points to the first two kinds of situations, and this is a string of line lest continued convergence of series and pour it back trouble. This is of course in mathematics is absolutely perfect, but too cumbersome to operate, and this special case is rare, even not necessary.

sum up, obviously, is the only division of the pen.




have any questions, please continue to ask, to thoroughly understand the matter thoroughly, is the most important. These extra lessons will be launched from time to time, but not detract from the fact that, next time we should talk about new content, the old problems are accumulated to a certain extent, will be making up.

The following is 2008-3-15


First, make sure that all standard type.


type
as if the nature of the adjacent, then there must be no less than former top after the top, before the end after the end of not higher than, and in the top row, you must be new at the end, the top of this the most consecutive the first one, and this together emerging at the end is a new, and those among the top, are X out; in the bottom row, you must be new top end of the first of these continuous one, and this together top emerging is a new, and those between the end of all X out.
so I hope we can do more for the discussion of this issue or to comment, does not mean that other issues can not, but at least read this article if you want to comment on you gotta tell me express my views on the core issues it ? Or criticism can be, but like him to discuss the purpose of this problem. Thank you!
if not lower than the bottom of the front end of the back, then if we type the following before the onset of a roof, if there is a classification lower than the front end of the bottom, then, these two are not classified correctly, the by the pen is not completed; such as typing the following before the onset of a roof, no less than the front end of the bottom type, then the following type of a roof, necessarily higher than the front end, so the front end and the roof type is the new N +1 pen, therefore, the first N N +1 pen pen and have a unique division, the first N different pen started by contradiction.



Note that the level and the gap has nothing to do where the K line graph, and the ID theory, only the trend level of the relevant type. K in different cycles of the level and trend charts, just as the microscope and the microscope in different times of the degree of the objects observed, the analogy has repeatedly said, can not be confused.
line division, and that was not difficult, the key is from the definitions. And with a line segment by the provisions of the two cases is not difficult to prove that the division line is unique.

such gaps, with the upward as an example. First of all, to give a clear definition of the gap, this definition is beneficial to the classification, only to be clearly defined in clear complete classification. What is a gap, that is, on the flat line graph K K line between the two adjacent intervals there was no transaction. For example, in the Shanghai Index daily chart in units of K, 1994 July 29 and August 1 to the [339,377] in the interval there was no transaction. That said, [339,377] is a gap. The gap of the cover, that is, the gap appears, the final interval of the gap closing all the process again. This process may be in the next K lines to appear, may never appear. For example, [339,377] this gap, although not say never again to cover, but was eliminated before the stock market, probably no chance to cover the. As the ID of the class of people fortunate enough to experience this day, blessed. Remember this ID, the ID was in July 29, 1994 the maximum amount of shares bought, Shenzhen is the source of the old stars, Shanghai is great fun to fly.
assumption is a picture of each program, then the paragraphs of this chart is it? ? I think that is the 3 1-4 is a 4-13 is a 13-22 is a paragraph. Here is my analysis: four of the top features of type sequence is 2-3,4-5,6-7, is the second situation, the study is behind the bottom type, obviously the bottom type 7 feature sequence is 5-6,7-8,9-10 is the second case, it is necessary to use under the then divided the first two kinds of situations of situation, because if the second case also points first, then we should look at seven of the bottom of whether a roof type classification, while if the type is still behind the top of the second case, then they would looked back at the end type, such as wrapping the article on the sister, this is too cumbersome and there is no need; therefore can not control where the bottom type 7 is the first or the second case, as long as the bottom type , then four of the top sub-type to set up. So was a 1-4.

Because of this, so in the second case, the judge in the second signature sequence, are no longer points to the first two kinds of situations, and this is a string of line lest continued convergence of series and pour it back trouble. This is of course in mathematics is absolutely perfect, but too cumbersome to operate, and this special case is rare, even not necessary.

Obviously, there are gaps at K line graph, any of the following in the daily cycle of the corresponding K line graph will have gaps, and cover the gap at the line, not necessarily covering the following cycle, the daily chart on the K gap. In addition, the consolidation trend in the gap, and the gap in the trend of a different nature, belonging to the ordinary gap, this gap, generally covering, but not much of significance, the only meaning there is in the central shock a goal, that is, the process of pulling back, almost certainly at least back to fill out the location of the gap.
line if we insist on characteristic sequence covering the final destruction of the gap conditions So, if the line segment B or C on the second case, then the line segment C of the range of positive features to the segment A and segment B sequence characteristics of the gap between the sequence of gaps, and so on, is always a line X, so the corresponding previous characteristic sequence segments are covering the gap, otherwise, they would be infinitely narrow segment of the interval, the last will form a point, which is obviously impossible, learned the limits should be able to understand. So, in a string of former relative line segment is the second string line situation, such as the ultimately lead to the destruction of the first case, push the back down so there is bound to assume that a string of straight line segments between the damage.

later than the end, then the front of the division is obviously wrong, because according to this division, the extra is not completed, a bottom does not have a post after a lower top end This is the most typical case of the pen not completed.
gap finished, to say that, classification, pen, line problems.

But the question now is that the rebound in the trend of A to the damaged segment, therefore, that the trend is definitely not the A still continue, so the trend behind the trend and has nothing to do A, therefore, the only reasonable division, is to First the pen damage, the trend A, a rebound synthesis of a segment, which fully meet the definition of line, so there will be a 81-82.

end 1-4 was a 4-13 is a 13-22 is a total of three paragraphs.
below 13 the end of the second type is the case, then the top 16 regardless of the first type as the second case it is true, then 13 will be able to confirm the end of established type. The top 16 again to determine whether to establish a classification, because the second case from time to time, you must visit 19 of the bottom type, and combined into 17-20,19, 19-20 including 17-18 at the end of typing does not hold, then the 16 top-type can not be established.


With this basic work
To help you learn this lesson
covering according to whether the gap to constitute a market trend of the intensity of a category. First, do not cover, which is obviously strong; Second, the cover and continue a high or low, this potential is flat; third, after covering can not be a high or low,tory burch shoes on sale, resulting in turn in the original trend, which is weak.
Why, then, to distinguish the second case, because it does not want to appear on the segment level to turn up the level of such a small level of uncertainty, with the second case will be able to solve this problem.
another in accordance with the understanding I do not agree with 1-4 is a 4-7 is a 7-10 is a 10-13 is a 13-16 is a 16-19 is the section 19-22 is a total of 7.
K line, pen, re-line problem resolution II Legend: (2008-03-19 09:20:49) division on the line, I had The article drawn graphics, and and do some of us.
Will the diagram first few paragraphs, Figure II is a few paragraphs?
analysis diagram of a first, assuming that 6 is the end to turn a 6-7 type, and then treated as containing 6-9 6-7,8-9, 4-5,6-9 its characteristic sequence, does not constitute the end of typing; assuming 10 base type, 10-11 as a turning point, then combined into a 6-5, 4-5,6-7, characterized sequence 6-5,10-11,12 -13, at the end type set up; therefore Figure 10 is the first two 1-10-15 is a section.
look at Figure II, 6 type as the end of the second case, the top 11 must see whether the establishment of type ,9-10 ,11-12 combined 11-10, so its characteristic sequence is 7 - 8,11-10,13-14, the top classification was established, so the end of six sub-type has also set up; look at 11 top type, apparently the first case, set up; so Figure II is a three-segment, 1 - 6 is a 6-11 is a 11-14 is a. Center in the center:
Line by the so-called Case 1 among the special segment, all refer to the original line were destroyed after the first significant (ie, line by document destruction) then the first interval in front of several shocks, the final form of the segment end points not the highest or lowest point of line special segment.
you must note that special emphasis in the second case, the second characteristic sequence, in fact, corresponds to line B line C of the damage, no points the first, two kinds of situation. This is actually a simplified method. Why?
Third, after the second treatment step, the remaining sub-type, if the adjacent top and bottom is, then this can be classified as a.
If the front end of
believe that we have no problem here,girls air jordan shoes, but later appeared to understand the different, the core issue of this article is here: the top four after the establishment of sub-type classification that 7 is formed at the end? I in different place several different times to see the Friends of the different articles and replies bound, that under the above sister wrapped around the phrase First, two kinds of situations, paragraph. But I do not agree with this understanding, I think this sentence is, relatively speaking, in watching the top four when the type is set up the bottom of the seven sub-type is not the first the second case, but when 4 re-established classification of the top seven at the end type is formed, seven of the bottom type is not characteristic sequence, , but in the end determine the seven classification itself but also distinguish the first and second time, because in both cases the end of seven sub-type which is not the same meaning. Then we must examine whether the 10 top-type set up, as 10-11 including 8-9, after treatment later became contains 9-10, the top-10 classification does not hold, then the bottom seven are not set up type the.
, special food insects Links BLOG happy vs two articles


do not know that I have clarified this issue, but still welcome discussion.
nonsense can not be continuous, said technology is now back up. Re-tell some of the concepts, because some concepts are too basic, if not clear, the latter is always one word: chaos. In order to chaos, hope is the last time in front of the most basic concepts then tell it.
Apparently, after the above three steps,tory burch flats sale, all of the pen can be uniquely delineated.

Second, if the type is the same before and after the nature of the two, for the top, in front of the lower back, leaving only the back of the front that can X out; the end of the front than the back, leaving only the back , in front of that you can X out. Does not meet the above conditions, such as equal, can be retained.