Information Times (reporter Yan Xiaoguang) Hong Kong businessmen Sumou said Liang Yijun has represented two of the implementation of the driver case, shift to the 8.75 million yuan put into the implementation of their own pockets, Sumou this began the long road action.
the case by May 2004 from last 6 years,
vibram sale, 5 times by different trial courts, still no results, which in civil cases,
vibram kso, extremely rare. The Sumou I actually also the course of proceedings
agent the implementation of paragraph more than 2,700 million yuan, of which 8.75 million yuan puts stuffed into their own pockets.
2004, the Sumou prosecuted to the Guangzhou City Intermediate Liang Yijun infringement, only to have Sumou Liang Yijun come up with a signed agency contracts,
fivefingers shoes, contracts Disi Kuan agreed: provide risk agents, the case involved paid the full cost of the Liang Yijun, the case in favor of all the judgments in accordance with Sumou after winning 50% of the payment of agency fees, as Liang Yijun partners.
Although Sumou that this contract was forged signatures and stolen their own knowledge, but is still forced Sumou the contract for the recovery of the 8.75 million yuan embarked on a long road of litigation.
won only one report 6
this case from playing deceptively simple yet the results of 6 years,
醉酒司机连撞两车后驾车冲进酒店(图), respectively, the plaintiff had to infringement, unjust enrichment and contract disputes are three reasons for prosecution by Guangzhou, Shaoguan, handing the different courts 5 trial, still no results. This is in civil cases, but also extremely rare.
win is the only hospital in Guangzhou in October 2008 decision,
vibram 5 fingers shoes, to determine agency costs related to breach of contract in 1997, should be returned. While Sumou I thought I could wish fulfilled, the Liang Yijun further appealed to the Guangdong Higher Court,
vibram fingers, the High Court also considered that since the two sides have signed agency contracts, can not be considered to receive 8.75 million yuan Liang Yijun no legal basis for contract disputes can be Sumou sue Judgement accordingly dismissed the claims of Sumou.
Sumou family said litigation from the beginning of 2004, litigation costs have already reached 60 million, Sumou himself because Jilao, product gas into the illness and death.
successor Last year, the five heirs Pianxiang Sumou Shaoguan contract dispute lawsuit filed in the Court, claims the contract is invalid.
how materials renewable variables. Shaoguan in the hospital before the Su Mousheng not claim the contract is invalid, can not exceed Sumou mean heirs, and filed the complaint on the grounds the contract null and void, once again rejected the claims of five children.
Recently, they have filed an appeal,
司机打伤一家六口被拘 父母坚称其属自卫, that the implementation can return the money to determine their inheritance rights can be achieved, and void the contract in essence a violation of the law, the state does not recognize the validity of such contracts Therefore, anyone can claim the contract is invalid, the court should on its review of active intervention to confirm the contract null and void.
the case before trial in the Guangdong Higher Court.